Are your sacraments "vaild"?
According to C. B. Moss: "The ministry of every communion is valid for that communion. Disputes about validity only arise when the mutual recognition of different communions is proposed, or when a minister of one communion wishes to serve in another. Every communion has the right to decide for itself what conditions it requires for its ministry ..." (1)
And, Peter E. Fink, S.J. of the Weston School of Theology writes, "the [current] determining factor for validity on the part of the church is the presentation through sacramental signs of the saving grace of Christ to one who is capable of receiving that grace" and "it is difficult to dismiss [even a defective sacramental] act as empty and without sacramental value ..." (2)
The currect Roman Catholic Code of Canon Law states: "Whenever necessity requires it or true spiritual advantage suggests it, and provided that danger of error or indifferentism is avoided, the Christian faithful for whom it is physically or morally impossible to approach a [Roman] Catholic minister are permitted to receive the sacraments of penance, Eucharist and anointing of the sick from non-[Roman] Catholic ministers in whose Churches these sacraments are valid." (3)
We strongly recommend that those wishing an ecumenical understanding of the issue of "sacramental validity" read the World Council of Church's 1982 Statement on Baptism, Eucharist, and Ministry—AKA "The Lima Statement."
(1) see C. B. Moss, The Old Catholic Movement: Its Origins and History (London: S.P.C.K., 1964), pp. 308ff.
(2) see Peter E. Fink, S.J., "Validity, Sacramental," in The New Dictionary of Sacramental Worship (Collegeville: The Liturgical Press, 1990), pp. 1298ff.
(3) see Canon 844, 2.
Fair Use Notice: This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. In accord with our nonprofit mission, we are making such material available for education purposes to advance understanding of political, human, religious, and social issues.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in reviewing the included information by virtue of their perusal of the various educational pages and links from this web site.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For further information on fair use, go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml